Elena Labzina, PhD

AI Researcher & Engineer

LLM Behavior · Human Reasoning · Causal AI

How do information systems change not only what we believe, but how we reason?

I investigate how AI interactions shape human reasoning, judgment, and meaning-making, combining computational social science, experimental methods, and machine learning.

I serve as Head of Causal AI/ML at Kanvaz AI Labs, leading research and architecture for causal, auditable enterprise decision systems. Previously, I worked at Google, Microsoft, and ETH Zürich. I hold a PhD in Political Science and an MA in Statistics from Washington University in St. Louis, alongside earlier degrees in applied mathematics, computer science, and economics.

My earlier research examined information manipulation, political communication, and coordinated editing on Wikipedia. My current work investigates how interactions with conversational AI may influence human reasoning and judgment, and why their effects might differ across users. Across these topics, I emphasize rigorous measurement, causal identification, and reproducible evaluation.

Ongoing research program

When AI Agrees: Sycophancy, Human Reasoning, and Adult Development

This research investigates whether and how conversational AI influences human reasoning, judgment, and agency. A central question is whether these effects vary with adults' developmental structures of meaning-making. Combining ego-development measures, experimental manipulations of AI behavior, and measures of integrative complexity, the work examines heterogeneity in responses to sycophantic AI.

The program integrates preregistered human experiments with computational behavioral evaluation and research on human-calibrated simulation.

Open-source experimental prototype · In development

Sycophancy Survey Agent

A locally hosted conversational AI prototype for investigating how different assistant behaviors may shape human reasoning and meaning-making. Built on Qwen3-14B, it implements neutral and sycophantic conversational conditions using the same underlying model, with differences in evaluative affirmation and alignment with the user's framing.

The current prototype supports discussions of AI regulation and clean energy, adjustable conversation duration, optional web search, and transcript export. Treatment calibration and evaluation are ongoing.

View the open-source prototype → Methodology →

Open-source research tooling

Controllable Sycophancy Evals

An open-source behavioral-evaluation framework developed alongside my research on heterogeneous responses to conversational AI. It supports controlled variation in synthetic-user reasoning profiles while holding topic, stance, and confidence fixed, with separate generation, constraint checks, and stage-blind evaluation. Validation results and limitations are documented in the repository.

Explore the code & methodology →

View all publications on Google Scholar →

I am preparing a human–AI interaction study examining how AI assistants may influence people's reasoning. Volunteer pre-screening is available; completing it does not commit you to participating in the subsequent study.

Learn more and participate →

I welcome research collaborations at the intersection of AI behavior, human reasoning, adult development, computational social science, and causal inference. I am particularly interested in experiments on heterogeneous responses to AI, behavioral evaluation of language models, and AI-mediated reasoning and agency. I co-organized SICSS Zürich at ETH in 2019 and have presented work in academic and industry settings. I also welcome invitations for talks and guest lectures.

Get in touch →